Search found 10 matches
- Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:03 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 29336
Re: Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
That's pretty much in line with my thinking, ExSport. My additional thought there is that less code means it's easier to understand, which means easier debugging and an easier time for new people wanting to contribute. If there's something in V1 that someone needs, and it's missing in V2, we can alw...
- Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:48 am
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 29336
Re: Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
If you change those APIs we'll have other (bigger) problems... I'm not sure why that would be, as long as I were to change everywhere that's calling into them, but that's off topic. As for the issue you had with V2, it's quite possible that it's resolved with the switch to Netty 4; when I did that,...
- Sun Jan 25, 2015 6:28 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: HTML Console
- Replies: 0
- Views: 11354
HTML Console
It's kind of a small thing... Right now, if a client makes either a GET or HEAD request to /console/scan or /console/stop, UMS starts or stops the library scan. But is it actually correct to perform the action for a HEAD request? It feels wrong to have a HEAD request cause side-effects. Does it make...
- Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:46 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 29336
Re: Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
I'd be all for fixing whatever the issue is in V2...
- Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:12 am
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: [Solved] Cleanup stale branches
- Replies: 7
- Views: 22063
[Solved] Cleanup stale branches
The git repo has a lot of stale branches. How about we do some cleanup and delete branches that have been merged into master? You can get a list of those branches via . (I counted 33 of them.)
Code: Select all
git branch -a --merged
- Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:59 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 29336
Drop support for old HTTP Engine V1?
I'd like to propose dropping support for the old HTTP Engine. I suspect there aren't really any users changing their UMS.conf to not use the default V2. Technically, it would be a breaking change (so, semantic versioning would say that it needs to wait until version 6.0.0), but I'd like to remove th...
- Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:50 am
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Exclusion of Chromecast Support?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13097
Re: Exclusion of Chromecast Support?
Thanks, I missed that in the config. I'd still be concerned about including v0.0.3 though; v0.0.5 should have fixes for the bugs I reported, so I'd at least recommend pulling in the latest.
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:11 am
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Exclusion of Chromecast Support?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13097
Exclusion of Chromecast Support?
v5.0.0-b1 includes su.litvak.chromecast:api-v2:0.0.3. I've run into a number of issues with the library that persist in the latest v0.0.5-SNAPSHOT, which make me question whether it's a good idea to include it in UMS (in its current form). Doing so makes UMS less stable. Perhaps make it an experimen...
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 4:58 pm
- Forum: Media Renderers
- Topic: Samsung Galaxy Tab 3
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5292
Re: Samsung Galaxy Tab 3
I compared the traffic with what is sent by my Rygel server. (The tablet is able to browse content on it.) After tweaking UMS to send back the below SearchCaps, the error message went away, but UMS doesn't return any results to the tablet. (Unsurprising.) <SearchCaps>@id,@parentID,@refID,upnp:class,...
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 3:58 pm
- Forum: Media Renderers
- Topic: Samsung Galaxy Tab 3
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5292
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3
Trying to troubleshoot why my Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 thinks there's no content on my UMS. I am using fresh build of commit 08f96d1a90bdbdcfeb7d409e4ae3711fc0a343a8 and the built-in "Video" player on the device. It's able to see the UMS server (under "Nearby Devices"), but when I se...